Merida Initiative: A Continuation in the Cycle of Violence

 In Arms Sales and Military Aid

On Wednesday, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee passed the "Merida Initiative to Combat Illicit Narcotics and Reduce Organized? Crimes Authorization Act of 2008.” Also known as “Plan Mexico”, a less than popular name due to its resemblance to “Plan Colombia”, the initiative calls for a foreign aid package of close to $1.6 billion meant to combat drug trafficking and organized crime in Mexico. A bulk of the money has been specifically designated to fund the acquisition of military equipment such as helicopters and weapon systems.  This is, in my opinion the worst plan proposed at the worst time.

For one, it fuels a widespread speculation that the so-called “aid” is part of a larger strategic national security initiative, “a sort of Marshall Plan for Latin America, that runs parallel to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.”  It also begs to question whether infusing Mexico with a multibillion military project will have the same effect as it has had in Colombia, where an increase in human right abuses and paramilitary violence have taken place since Plan Colombia was implemented seven years ago.

While President Felipe Calderon touts his government’s revamped efforts to address widespread drug-related violence in the country and while he views the Merida Initiative as a much needed step in the right direction; widespread reports of human rights violations and abuses at the hands of Mexican security forces have hit an all-time high. Opposition groups in Mexico have denounced the initiative as a ploy to strengthen the military’s policing role in Mexican society, to increase counter-intelligence and anti-subversive mechanisms and to provide the government with resources for stronger involvement in the affairs of individuals, all of which has been disguised under the umbrella of a drug war, such as was the case with Plan Colombia.

While the social components of the initiative seem to hit the high notes of an otherwise flat symphony, some wonder whether these represent mere demagoguery. As the Latin American Working Group has rightly pointed out,

“Not a penny of the Merida Initiative will provide aid to reduce poverty, it further skews aid to Latin America in the direction of security assistance rather than aid for public health, poverty reduction, and disaster assistance. The Merida Initiative also does nothing to solve the problems on our side of the border that increase violence in Mexico and Central America: the United States’ demand for illegal drugs and the flow of U.S. firearms into the region.”

What is in the package is a strong military and strategic component that falls short of sending U.S. troops to Mexican soil, such that it provides strict guidelines for the training of Mexican troops, it counsels Mexican agencies on U.S. requirements enlisting private U.S. enterprises to assist in anti-narcotics equipment and guidance and provides for mere human rights and ethics “suggestions” in dealing with bystanders and society at large. In other words, the “aid” has been formulated as an incentive and reward to Calderon’s government, and a slap in the face to Human Right defenders in Mexico.

This year marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations. As Bloggers Unite celebrates this remembrance with the credo “that all people are born with basic rights and freedoms that include life, liberty, and justice,” it is imperative that we take a closer look at the effects that our involvement in different regions and countries around the world is having to its citizens. The Merida Initiative, Plan Colombia, The Iraq war, have all been sold to the America public as efforts in democratization, peace, prosperity and security, all of which have shown exactly the opposite. They have destabilized regions, fueled insurgencies, increased violence cycles and most importantly they have threatened the core principles of the rights to life, liberty and justice.

Recent Posts
Showing 4 comments
  • Carl

    I don’t know why president Bush has to keep on getting us into more and more trouble throughout the world. He seems to think that the answer to everything is to use military force. What the U.S. needs now is more friends and less military involvement. There are other ways to solve problems without having to use military means. Furthermore, the whole war on drug thing has got to stop, it is endless and unnecessary. Everyone has a right to chose what he does with his or her own body. No government has a right to interfere.
    As far as Calderon is concerned, the people voted for him basically because he was PAN and they didn’t want to go back so soon to PRI. Furthermore, before the elections, he promised to be the “president of employment”. He didn’t say anything about being that anti-narco president. The people didn’t vote for that. Pure lies from Calderon
    Another thing is that he barely won. Not only that, but he suspiciously won exactly the way Bush won both of his elections. I think further investigation is merited in both the Bush and Calderon elections. I happen to think that some dirty work is responsible for them winning.

  • Dave Donelson

    It is difficult to see how armed helicopters and automatic weapons help the cause of human rights, isn’t it?
    Dave Donelson, author of Heart of Diamonds

  • Juan Martinez

    I have a lot of family in Mexico, and they tell me everyone who knows about it loves the idea of money for the military. They have done a great job in selling it as an anti-drug operation. I just hope equal eforts in informing the public are being done there as we will do here.

  • carl

    Hi guys here is a great link of a new article about how well dumping money and military into the drug war works the article came out today and is titled “shock rise in colombia coca production” that should pretty clearly show that initiatives such as merida don’t work at all. the link is

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search