That’s Not Change – It’s More of the Same

 In Afghanistan

Yesterday, President Obama announced his decision to send 17,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan, on the grounds that ‘the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan demands urgent attention’. Peace Action strongly opposes Obama’s recent announcement and urges people to immediately call on Obama to choose diplomacy, not escalation.

More troops won’t solve our problems in Afghanistan. Click here to tell President Obama and Congress that we need a comprehensive plan for Afghanistan before risking more American and Afghan lives.

We have seen the disastrous consequences of heading into war without a plan in Iraq. We are still mourning American and Iraqi lives lost, and struggling to rehabilitate our economy while spending billions of dollars on war.

Peace Action calls for the ‘rapid withdrawal’ of U.S. troops from Afghanistan and a new commitment to a negotiated diplomatic solution involving all regional players.

The Obama Administration should:

  1. De-escalate troop levels in Afghanistan and to reject the idea that there is a military solution to the region’s problems;
  2. Immediately stop military activities that indiscriminately impact civilians such as air and drone strikes;
  3. Rapidly withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan;
  4. Commit to negotiated diplomatic talks involving all major regional players, including major international peace-keeping bodies;
  5. Address the real needs of Afghans, which include health-care, clean water, education, and security.

Send this important message to our President and Congress.

Since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, Al Qaeda has increased its attacks. Last year saw the most civilian deaths in Afghanistan since the U.S. invaded, and a new poll shows that only 18% of Afghans want more U.S. troops. Bombings of civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan are angering the populations in both countries and their governments, undermining the U.S.’s ability to create stability. We cannot simply intensify the Bush administration’s failed policy. Now is the time for us to press President Obama and Congress to find a better approach to Afghanistan.

General David Patreaus has called Afghanistan the “graveyard of empires.”  An authoritative report released last year demonstrated that military force has historically been unsuccessful in defeating terrorism [1]. Counterinsurgency experts have said that a military strategy would require hundreds of thousands of troops we can’t send, and even if we did there would be no guarantee of success.

We have heard a lot about why we need to shift resources to Afghanistan, but we need to hear a lot more about what kind of resources would be truly effective. There are many other pieces of this puzzle. Can you help us send this urgent message today?

Graveyard of Empires:  Military esclation will not bring peace.
Correcting Our Mistakes:
Who, and why, we are fighting in Afghanistan.

Footnote: 1. According to a RAND Corporation report, since 1968, only seven percent of all terrorist groups that have ended were taken down by military force. In contrast, 40 percent of those groups were defeated through police and intelligence work, and 43 percent gave up terrorism as they were integrated into the political process. The framework of the “Global War on Terror” has set up unrealistic expectations of a military victory against non-state actors, and the apportioning of counterterrorism resources has reflected that flawed approach.


Kevin M. Martin
Executive Director

Recommended Posts
Showing 5 comments
  • Sally Ann Gray

    Whatever happens we have to support all the troops no matter what the decision might be. Failure to do that is not fair to the men and women fighting to protect America and the rest of the free world

  • Barbara Liebowitz

    no more war we need to build our country back together

  • Barbara Tomlinson

    What exactly, does “supporting the troops” mean?
    We need to support THOSE TROOPS WHO REFUSE TO FIGHT. There are more of them, than we are allowed to know about. Returning Veterans, such as those in the group Veterans Against the Iraq War, tell of small and large acts of Resistance by troops. Some go AWOL, some attempt to leave the military by applying for being Conscientious Objectors; some courageously disobey direct orders that they feel are WRONG, are WAR CRIMES; such as orders to torture prisoners, for example. Bagram Air Force Base prison in Afghanistan, has the SAME dirty reputation for torturing and killing prisoners, as Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib.

    Soldiers are always, always MEN AND WOMEN WITH CONSCIENCES, WITH MORAL VALUES. They are not mere robots who shed responsibility for their acts, by the line “I was only following orders”. Soldiers just like the rest of us, have, and exercise, CHOICES. More and more of them are coming to know, that THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA HAS NO BUSINESS WHATSOEVER, IN AFGHANISTAN OR IN IRAQ. Those troops KNOW, that they are NOT “defending” their country or their communities or families, in any way, shape or form.

    WE MUST UNEQUIVOCALLY SUPPORT THOSE SOLDIERS WHO BRAVELY REFUSE ORDERS, REFUSE TO FIGHT. We must get thru the curtain of military censorship; and make our opposition to this war loud and clear; that is the BEST way of “supporting the troops”, and letting them know that they have OUR support for THEIR opposition.

  • John-Michael P. Talboo

    Thank you for putting this together. Please also take action in demanding a truth commission…

  • Russell Riley

    Viet-Nam, Iraq, now Afghanistan, WON’T you people in Congress ever learn? Americans are tried of fighting wars that we have no business in. How many more lives and families need to be destroyed by a senseless war? Are you Mr. President trying to be a war-time CINC just for reputation? You say you want to help the economy yet you are doing just opposite by staying in a land of turmoil while we are not needed or wanted.

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search