Let's Give Diplomacy a Chance in Ukraine

 In A Foreign Policy for All, diplomacy, Military contractors, Nuclear, Nuclear Weapons, Obama Administration, War, war profiteers

I don’t pretend to be an expert on Ukraine, or Ukrainian-Russian social, historical and economic ties. I do recall after the break-up of the Soviet Union there was consternation in Ukraine, a country about the size and population of France in what Ukrainians consider to be the heart of Europe (it’s not “Eastern Europe,” that’s the westernmost part of Russia), that all anyone seemed to care about was the disposition of Soviet nuclear weapons there. Ukraine wisely gave up the nukes, returning them to Russia, but I recall a justifiably angry quote by a Ukrainian that the attitude of most of the world was “Give us your nukes and go to hell.” And of course Ukrainians still deal with the awful legacy of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster nearly 30 years ago.

As the current situation in Ukraine devolves into an increasingly horrible war, we see an urgent diplomatic initiative led by Germany and France contrasted by contradictory “tough talk” by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and some in Congress advocating increased U.S. weapons sales to Ukraine while admitting there is no military solution.

So let’s just skip the field day for the weapons dealers and focus on diplomacy.

Here is a radio interview I did yesterday on the status of diplomacy and pressure for increased U.S. weapons sales to Ukraine on KPFA Pacifica radio. One part they didn’t use was my question about how anyone can justify the loss of life in this increasingly horrible war when the likely outcome is known now — some sort of de facto autonomous region for the Russian population of Eastern Ukraine, with assurances to Russia by the U.S., NATO, European Union and Ukraine that the country will not become the eastern-most outpost of U.S./Western European military/strategic/political economic neo-imperialism — whether it becomes a reality in a week, a month, or a year from now. How is this situation worth anyone dying over? (Host David Rosenberg replied that could be said of most wars, I wish they had aired that part of our exchange!)

And here is a letter to the editor I sent to the New York Times last week, unpublished.

February 3, 2015

To the editor:

Sending U.S. weaponry to Ukraine as the conflict there escalates is a horrible idea (“U.S. considers supplying arms to Ukraine forces, officials say,” February 1) unless the objective is to increase overall death and destruction there. Any moves that inflame the situation in Ukraine should be avoided. Apart from the situation in Ukraine itself, U.S. and NATO triumphalist policies since the end of the Cold War have needlessly and unwisely isolated Russia, at a time when the U.S. and Russia need better relations, not worse, for cooperation on a host of issues including nuclear weapons reductions, bringing peace, stability and security to the broader Middle East region and addressing violent extremism and global climate change.

U.S. arms transfers into regions of conflict are short-sighted and have a spectacularly bad record of blowback and unintended consequences against our country and our allies (in Iraq and Afghanistan, to note only two bitter and current examples). It’s hard to recall many instances where such transfers brought about peace and stability instead of worsening armed conflict. Let’s give renewed diplomacy involving the various actors in the region a chance instead.

Sincerely,

Kevin Martin

Executive Director

Peace Action

I’d be interested to know what readers of this blog think we, as U.S. peace activists, should advocate regarding Ukraine and specifically U.S. government policies toward the conflict.

Recommended Posts
Showing 3 comments
  • Jerry "Peacemaker"
    Reply

    The question which needs to become answered, given the great humanitarian crisis being suffered by innocent Ukrainians, is: “why is America’s first response to send heavy weaponry, instead of most people’s automatic reaction – to send humanitarian aid for the suffering millions?” Answering that question brings a full awareness and understanding of motivations and intent. Oil, gas, agribusiness (including Monsanto/GMO)… Ukraine has massive agriculture sector, the “breadbasket of Europe”. Joe Biden and John Kerry have a lot of explaining to do when their son and stepson are involved in Ukraine’s largest private energy firm – Burisma Holdings… It’s a resource war like all others, nothing to do with “freedom and democracy”, but everything to do with wealth and power, the reason 80 individuals own as much wealth as 3.5 billion on this Earth.

  • KevinMartin
    Reply

    Well stated, uncovering said motivations is critical.

  • vipe
    Reply

    Pls visit this site and start earning some cash. Fellows is real. Pls visit this site and register. It simple. All the best comrade: http://youthvisit.com/?userid=79742

Leave a Comment

Start typing and press Enter to search